Will Injury Lawyer Stouffville Talk About Informed
Consent And Its Effects On Medical Malpractice
The definition of informed consent is that a patient who is being treated should be fully informed by their doctors of any risks involved int their treatment. Injury lawyer in Stouffville talks when the procedure is not followed, and a patient is not informed of the risks, any injury caused during this treatment can have grounds to sue the doctor for medical malpractice. If you believe that you are a victim of medical malpractice, you should contact an Injury lawyer in Stouffville immediately to know your legal options.
Informed Consent
All medical procedures involve a certain amount of risk. In order for the patient to move forward with their treatment, it is vital for the doctor to give information regarding the treatment procedure. They should also clearly state all known risks involved.
A consent form is the usual norm. However, when a patient signs a consent form it does not necessarily mean that the patient has given consent. A detailed discussion and the patients understanding of the risks is needed.In most medical malpractice cases, the Injury lawyer in Stouffville says that informed consent is the issue. The patient should have adequate grounds to bring a case against the medial officer.
Doctor’s disclosure
It is not necessary that all details of risks be informed to the patient. The risks that are most likely to occur should be explained. Doctors should follow the norm of this disclosure. The patient suing should not have another doctor testify that this situation should have been informed. If a remote possible risk occurs, it doesn’t mean that this should have been explained.Many times, the law looks at other patients having similar conditions. Alternate treatments of a particular condition should also be informed.
Exceptions to Informed Consent
If the case is an emergency, the doctor may be excused from informed consent due to lack of time. A doctor may also choose not to give an emotionally unstable patient too many details. However, the doctor should have a clear reason or explanation for the same. Injury lawyer in Stouffville say that if there is a complication or added procedure to an already existing procedure, the patient may have no claim to malpractice.
For example, if the patient is going through a heart procedure and has given full consent for the same, the doctor may find another problem with the heart and may decide to act on that without gaining an individual consent for both the procedures.
There are varied instances that have to be looked into and the Injury lawyer in Stouffville would formulate a strong case. For more information visit here: Makaronets Personal Injury Law